Strengthening cross-border coordination is a growing trend with the development of other countries` enforcement rules. Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski said in announcing the Airbus resolution that „the department will continue to cooperate aggressively with our partners around the world to eradicate corruption, especially corruption that harms U.S. interests.  The DPA itself provides a remarkable mix of takeaways in terms of coordination between sovereigns. On the one hand, DOJ revoked its territorial jurisdiction of the FCPA on allegations that Airbus employees and agents sent emails and arranged luxury trips by foreign officials to U.S. sites during their stay in the United States.  On the other hand, in the relevant recitals of the agreement, the data protection authority contains an explicit recognition of the limits of US jurisdiction by the DOJ: „The company is neither a U.S. issuer nor a national company, and territorial jurisdiction for corruption is limited; Although the interests of the United States are so important that a solution is warranted, the interests of France and the United Kingdom in the conduct of the company related to corruption and the judicial basis of a solution are much stronger, and the [U.S. government] has therefore deferred France and the United Kingdom to justify their respective interests, as they deem appropriate[.]  It will be interesting to see whether future intermarital resolutions (or even U.S. resolutions) contain similar statements about the limits of U.S. territorial jurisdiction or their narrower interests of the prosecutor under the FCPA. Despite growing criticism and controls, legal experts say the use of data protection authorities and NGOs will continue to increase.
Some people see this type of agreement as a business to let go, says Joseph Warin, president of Gibson Dunn -Crutchers White-Collar`s defense and investigative practice. „I think it`s a naïve vision.“ The Bradken DPA is remarkable for other reasons. For example, Bradken had to accept a specific method for calculating the applicable penalty margin, which would be used to convict Bradken if convicted of a breach by the data protection authority.  DPAs often frame the calculation of the USSG as a question of what the government believes it owes at the time of the agreement, without limiting the amount of a subsequent criminal sanction in the event of an infringement. Bradken-Dpa also asked the company to publish a public statement to the Casteel Reporter, a trade journal published by the Steel Founder`s Society of America, to educate „other public contractors“ on compliance issues.  NiSource is the parent company of Bay State Gas Company and is active as Columbia Gas of Massachusetts („CMA“).  The CMA agreed to plead guilty to violating the minimum safety standards of the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act.  In particular, the government asserted that the CMA had not implemented procedures to ensure the safety of the pipeline operations that eventually exploded.  The appeal agreement fined CMA $53,030,116.
 Figures for „monetary recoveries“ may include amounts that are not strictly limited to an ANPA or CCA, such as fines, penalties, collection and restitution requirements imposed by other regulatory and enforcement authorities, and amounts resulting from related transaction agreements that may be made under a comprehensive resolution related to the NPA or DPA, paid by the designated body and/or by the subsidiaries.